10/13/08

on good and evil

I was struck when I first read this passage:

In creation there is no evil, all is good. Certain qualities and natures innate in some men and apparently blameworthy are not so in reality. For example, from the beginning of his life you can see in a nursing child the signs of greed, of anger, and of temper. Then, it may be said, good and evil are innate in the reality of man, and this is contrary to the pure goodness of nature and creation. The answer to this is that greed, which is to ask for something more, is a praiseworthy quality provided that it is used suitably. So, if a man is greedy to acquire science and knowledge, or to become compassionate, generous, and just, it is most praiseworthy. If he exercises his anger and wrath against the bloodthirsty tyrants who are like ferocious beasts, it is very praiseworthy; but if he does not use these qualities in a right way, they are blameworthy.... It is the same with all the natural qualities of man, which constitute the capital of life; if they be used and displayed in an unlawful way, they become blameworthy. Therefore, it is clear that creation is purely good.

- Abdul Baha

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Its a fight for survival, not really greed or anger or temper. The baby shows it by the only way it can, by crying.If you were hungry and asked for something to eat would you call that greed?
Wit all due respect to the great scholar.

8&20 said...

not greed in the sense of it being a "bad" thing, as we are usually given to consider. but if you think of greed as the desire for something, then sure. in moderation, and to a positive end, it is a good thing.

and indeed, it is - to some extent - how we interpret these words and what we understand their scope to be.